Autonomous entity: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

====Communication styles====

Autonomous entities can communicate with a person via a combination of spoken word, “telepathy”, [[conceptual thinking|conceptual thoughts]], mathematics, and [[geometry]]-based visual linguistics which generally consist of morphing colored structures of different textures which are innately understandable as representations of specific concepts.

Autonomous entities can communicate with a person via a combination of spoken word, “telepathy”, [[conceptual thinking|conceptual thoughts]], mathematics, and [[geometry]]-based visual linguistics which generally consist of morphing colored structures of different textures which are innately understandable as representations of specific concepts. They will often convey insights regarding overcoming personal issues within a person’s life and will occasionally help clarify philosophical or spiritual ideas. However, more often than not entities are very likely to speak in a cryptic or nonsensical manner which seem to have no clear meaning behind them.

Regarding the conversational topics which autonomous entities choose to discuss, they will often convey insights regarding overcoming personal issues within the one's life and will occasionally help clarify philosophical or spiritual ideas. However, more often than not entities are very likely to speak in cryptic or nonsensical messages which seem to have no clear or obvious meaning behind them.

It is important to note that autonomous entities can never convey novel information to the person experiencing them. For example, they cannot provide insights about the external world which a person did not already know on some level. Instead, they can only provide alternative perspectives and help build upon existing ideas. This is presumably because autonomous entities do not have access to any knowledge which is not already contained within one's conscious or subconscious memories.

It is important to note that autonomous entities ~~will~~ never ~~truly~~ convey ~~new~~ information to the person experiencing them. For example, they cannot provide insights about the external world which ~~one~~ did not already know ~~about~~ on some level. Instead, they can only provide alternative perspectives and help build upon ~~pre-~~existing ideas. This is presumably because autonomous entities do not have access to any knowledge~~, information or facts~~ which ~~are~~ not already ~~stored~~ within one's conscious or subconscious memories.

When communicated with through spoken word, the level of coherency in which these entities can communicate with is highly variable but can be broken down into four distinct levels. These are described and listed below:

# '''Silence''' - ~~This~~ level can be ~~defined~~ as a complete unresponsiveness from ~~the side of~~ the entity and a lack of speech despite their ~~obvious~~ presence within the hallucination.

# '''Silence''' - At the lowest level the effect can be described as a complete unresponsiveness from the entity and a lack of speech despite their presence within the hallucination.

#'''Partially defined incoherent speech''' - ~~This~~ level can be ~~defined~~ as linguistic conversational responses and noises which almost sound like words but do not contain any real content or meaning beyond a vague sense of emotional intent.

#'''Partially defined incoherent speech''' - At this level the effect can be described as linguistic conversational responses and noises which almost sound like words but do not contain any real content or meaning beyond a vague sense of emotional intent.

#'''Fully defined incoherent speech''' - ~~This~~ level can be ~~defined~~ as audible linguistic conversational responses and noises which contain fully defined and understandable words but often lack grammatical structure or an overall sense of general coherency.

#'''Fully defined incoherent speech''' - At this level the effect can be described as audible linguistic conversational responses and noises which contain fully defined and understandable words, but often lack grammatical structure or an overall sense of general coherency.

#'''Partially defined coherent speech''' - ~~This~~ level can be ~~defined~~ as linguistic conversational responses which contain fully defined and understandable words with a partially defined grammatical structure and general coherency. It conveys its point on a level which is frequently coherent but may not always be fully understandable and will sometimes descend into broken English or even gibberish.

#'''Partially defined coherent speech''' - At this level the effect can be described as linguistic conversational responses which contain fully defined and understandable words with a partially defined grammatical structure and general coherency. It conveys its point on a level which is frequently coherent, but may not always be fully understandable and will sometimes descend into broken English or even gibberish.

#'''Fully defined coherent speech''' - ~~This~~ level can be ~~defined~~ as linguistic conversational responses which contain understandable words and a fully defined grammatical sentence structures. It has an overall sense of general coherency which conveys its point in a level of detail that is genuinely on par with that of ~~one's~~ own intellect.

#'''Fully defined coherent speech''' - At the highest level the effect can be described as linguistic conversational responses which contain understandable words and a fully defined grammatical sentence structures. It has an overall sense of general coherency which conveys its point in a level of detail that is genuinely on par with that of a person’s own intellect.

====Image examples====

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ====Communication styles====
-Autonomous entities can communicate with a person via a combination of spoken word, “telepathy”, [[conceptual thinking|conceptual thoughts]], mathematics, and [[geometry]]-based visual linguistics which generally consist of morphing colored structures of different textures which are innately understandable as representations of specific concepts.
+Autonomous entities can communicate with a person via a combination of spoken word, “telepathy”, [[conceptual thinking|conceptual thoughts]], mathematics, and [[geometry]]-based visual linguistics which generally consist of morphing colored structures of different textures which are innately understandable as representations of specific concepts. They will often convey insights regarding overcoming personal issues within a person’s life and will occasionally help clarify philosophical or spiritual ideas. However, more often than not entities are very likely to speak in a cryptic or nonsensical manner which seem to have no clear meaning behind them.
-Regarding the conversational topics which autonomous entities choose to discuss, they will often convey insights regarding overcoming personal issues within the one's life and will occasionally help clarify philosophical or spiritual ideas. However, more often than not entities are very likely to speak in cryptic or nonsensical messages which seem to have no clear or obvious meaning behind them.
+It is important to note that autonomous entities can never convey novel information to the person experiencing them. For example, they cannot provide insights about the external world which a person did not already know on some level. Instead, they can only provide alternative perspectives and help build upon existing ideas. This is presumably because autonomous entities do not have access to any knowledge which is not already contained within one's conscious or subconscious memories.
-It is important to note that autonomous entities will never truly convey new information to the person experiencing them. For example, they cannot provide insights about the external world which one did not already know about on some level. Instead, they can only provide alternative perspectives and help build upon pre-existing ideas. This is presumably because autonomous entities do not have access to any knowledge, information or facts which are not already stored within one's conscious or subconscious memories.
 When communicated with through spoken word, the level of coherency in which these entities can communicate with is highly variable but can be broken down into four distinct levels. These are described and listed below:
-# '''Silence''' - This level can be defined as a complete unresponsiveness from the side of the entity and a lack of speech despite their obvious presence within the hallucination.
+# '''Silence''' - At the lowest level the effect can be described as a complete unresponsiveness from the entity and a lack of speech despite their presence within the hallucination.
-#'''Partially defined incoherent speech''' - This level can be defined as linguistic conversational responses and noises which almost sound like words but do not contain any real content or meaning beyond a vague sense of emotional intent.
+#'''Partially defined incoherent speech''' - At this level the effect can be described as linguistic conversational responses and noises which almost sound like words but do not contain any real content or meaning beyond a vague sense of emotional intent.
-#'''Fully defined incoherent speech''' - This level can be defined as audible linguistic conversational responses and noises which contain fully defined and understandable words but often lack grammatical structure or an overall sense of general coherency.
+#'''Fully defined incoherent speech''' - At this level the effect can be described as audible linguistic conversational responses and noises which contain fully defined and understandable words, but often lack grammatical structure or an overall sense of general coherency.
-#'''Partially defined coherent speech''' - This level can be defined as linguistic conversational responses which contain fully defined and understandable words with a partially defined grammatical structure and general coherency. It conveys its point on a level which is frequently coherent but may not always be fully understandable and will sometimes descend into broken English or even gibberish.
+#'''Partially defined coherent speech''' - At this level the effect can be described as linguistic conversational responses which contain fully defined and understandable words with a partially defined grammatical structure and general coherency. It conveys its point on a level which is frequently coherent, but may not always be fully understandable and will sometimes descend into broken English or even gibberish.
-#'''Fully defined coherent speech''' - This level can be defined as linguistic conversational responses which contain understandable words and a fully defined grammatical sentence structures. It has an overall sense of general coherency which conveys its point in a level of detail that is genuinely on par with that of one's own intellect.
+#'''Fully defined coherent speech''' - At the highest level the effect can be described as linguistic conversational responses which contain understandable words and a fully defined grammatical sentence structures. It has an overall sense of general coherency which conveys its point in a level of detail that is genuinely on par with that of a person’s own intellect.
 ====Image examples====