This is an unofficial archive of PsychonautWiki as of 2025-08-11T15:14:44Z. Content on this page may be outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate. Please refer to the original page for the most up-to-date information.
Talk:2C-B: Difference between revisions
>Unity Reply to user Hydroxypcp |
>HydroxyPCP added response |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:{{ping|Hydroxypcp}} You are right in that the initial wording of the statement was a bit imprecise, or contained some ambiguity. "Derivative" can be a bit of a tricky word as its meaning can differ depending on whether it is used in, say, a strictly modern chemical context, or a looser historical one. I don't think it's necessarily wrong to say that 2C-x is a second-order derivative series of mescaline, with DOx being the first. The team has discussed this matter and decided on a clearer and more accurate way of wording the statement. We hope you find it reasonable. --[[User:Clarity|Clarity]] ([[User talk:Clarity|talk]]) 18:02, 16 November 2017 (CET) | :{{ping|Hydroxypcp}} You are right in that the initial wording of the statement was a bit imprecise, or contained some ambiguity. "Derivative" can be a bit of a tricky word as its meaning can differ depending on whether it is used in, say, a strictly modern chemical context, or a looser historical one. I don't think it's necessarily wrong to say that 2C-x is a second-order derivative series of mescaline, with DOx being the first. The team has discussed this matter and decided on a clearer and more accurate way of wording the statement. We hope you find it reasonable. --[[User:Clarity|Clarity]] ([[User talk:Clarity|talk]]) 18:02, 16 November 2017 (CET) | ||
:{{ping|Clarity}} Yes, now it sounds far better. [[User:Hydroxypcp|Hydroxypcp]] ([[User talk:Hydroxypcp|talk]]) 06:14, 17 November 2017 (CET) | |||