Autonomous voice communication: Difference between revisions

Line 9:

#'''Separately generated audible internal responses''' - This level can be defined as internal linguistic responses to one's own thoughts and feelings which are perceived as a clearly defined and audible voice within one's head. These can take on a variety of voices, accents and dialects but usually sound identical to one's own spoken voice.

The speaker behind this voice is innately interpreted by those who experience communication with it to be that of one's subconscious, the substance itself or even supernatural concepts such as god, spirits, souls and ancestors.

The speaker behind this voice is innately interpreted by those who experience communication with it to be either that of one's subconscious, the substance itself or even supernatural concepts such as god, spirits, souls and ancestors.

The conversational style of that which is discussed between both the voice and its host can be described as essentially identical in terms of its coherency and linguistic intelligibility as that of any other everyday interaction between the self and another human being with which one might engage in conversation with.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 #'''Separately generated audible internal responses''' - This level can be defined as internal linguistic responses to one's own thoughts and feelings which are perceived as a clearly defined and audible voice within one's head. These can take on a variety of voices, accents and dialects but usually sound identical to one's own spoken voice.
-The speaker behind this voice is innately interpreted by those who experience communication with it to be that of one's subconscious, the substance itself or even supernatural concepts such as god, spirits, souls and ancestors.
+The speaker behind this voice is innately interpreted by those who experience communication with it to be either that of one's subconscious, the substance itself or even supernatural concepts such as god, spirits, souls and ancestors.
 The conversational style of that which is discussed between both the voice and its host can be described as essentially identical in terms of its coherency and linguistic intelligibility as that of any other everyday interaction between the self and another human being with which one might engage in conversation with.