MDEA: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

In a 1967 lab notebook entry, Alexander Shulgin briefly mentioned a colleague's report of no effect from the substance with a 100mg dose.<ref>Rediscovering MDMA (ecstasy): the role of the American chemist Alexander T. Shulgin|doi=10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02948.x}}</ref> Shulgin later tested the compound at a range of higher doses and characterized the substance in his book [[PiHKAL]].<ref>PiHKAL|http://isomerdesign.com/PiHKAL/read.php?domain=pk&id=106</ref>

While MDEA shares many of the same entactogenic properties of MDMA, it is slightly less potent and considered to be more "stoning", lacking the pro-socializing and energizing "magic" most party-goers seek in their MDMA/Ecstasy experiences. As a result, it is largely considered by most people to be a less desirable version of ~~MDEA~~ and is thus rarely produced and sold in the illicit drug trade.

While MDEA shares many of the same entactogenic properties of MDMA, it is slightly less potent and considered to be more "stoning", lacking the pro-socializing and energizing "magic" most party-goers seek in their MDMA/Ecstasy experiences. As a result, it is largely considered by most people to be a less desirable version of MDMA and is thus rarely produced and sold in the illicit drug trade.

==Chemistry==

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 In a 1967 lab notebook entry, Alexander Shulgin briefly mentioned a colleague's report of no effect from the substance with a 100mg dose.<ref>Rediscovering MDMA (ecstasy): the role of the American chemist Alexander T. Shulgin|doi=10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02948.x}}</ref> Shulgin later tested the compound at a range of higher doses and characterized the substance in his book [[PiHKAL]].<ref>PiHKAL|http://isomerdesign.com/PiHKAL/read.php?domain=pk&id=106</ref>
-While MDEA shares many of the same entactogenic properties of MDMA, it is slightly less potent and considered to be more "stoning", lacking the pro-socializing and energizing "magic" most party-goers seek in their MDMA/Ecstasy experiences. As a result, it is largely considered by most people to be a less desirable version of MDEA and is thus rarely produced and sold in the illicit drug trade.
+While MDEA shares many of the same entactogenic properties of MDMA, it is slightly less potent and considered to be more "stoning", lacking the pro-socializing and energizing "magic" most party-goers seek in their MDMA/Ecstasy experiences. As a result, it is largely considered by most people to be a less desirable version of MDMA and is thus rarely produced and sold in the illicit drug trade.
 ==Chemistry==