Sitter/participant relationship quality: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

===#meta-note===

Here's some unprovable values that might be fun to expand upon or structure papers around sometime:

* Emphasize: self-mastery through strength/self-sacrifice with a heap of global interwoven mythological structures while maintaining a playful anti-institutional leaning.

* Dissuade: the idea person A is a better authority on person B than person B is upon themself, the simultaneous contradictory framework of institutionalized guilt and abdication of personal responsibility, both hermeneutic inflexibility and relativism, zero-sum toxic positivity games

Basically all my dissuades look like a Dolores Umbridge commanding everybody to empathize -> correcting them by telling them how they actually feel

<hr />

====note: don't harm participants, stupid. also your attention is being exploited by secular holy wars (which is cringe)====

Note: Avoid doing and believing others' self-righteous indignation (aka 'I'm harming you for your own good'); it's a self-justification for promoting harm towards others derived from nonprovable value systems. View these moral grandstanders with extreme suspicion as they typically produce the worst outcomes for others via the delusion that they do not act in self-interest.<ref>Milton Friedman</ref><ref>{{Citation | vauthors=((Watts, A.)) | title=24:43-28:00 Man in Nature | volume=The Tao of Philosophy}}</ref><ref>Joseph Campbell</ref><ref>Jordan Peterson</ref><ref>Bill Hicks</ref><ref>Bill Burr</ref> This behavior is born from mediocrity that fuels an ego-inflating/ego-protecting existential ressentiment.<ref>Friedrich Nietzsche</ref>

===References===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+===#meta-note===
+Here's some unprovable values that might be fun to expand upon or structure papers around sometime:
+* Emphasize: self-mastery through strength/self-sacrifice with a heap of global interwoven mythological structures while maintaining a playful anti-institutional leaning.
+* Dissuade: the idea person A is a better authority on person B than person B is upon themself, the simultaneous contradictory framework of institutionalized guilt and abdication of personal responsibility, both hermeneutic inflexibility and relativism, zero-sum toxic positivity games
+Basically all my dissuades look like a Dolores Umbridge commanding everybody to empathize -> correcting them by telling them how they actually feel
+<hr />
+====note: don't harm participants, stupid. also your attention is being exploited by secular holy wars (which is cringe)====
 Note: Avoid doing and believing others' self-righteous indignation (aka 'I'm harming you for your own good'); it's a self-justification for promoting harm towards others derived from nonprovable value systems. View these moral grandstanders with extreme suspicion as they typically produce the worst outcomes for others via the delusion that they do not act in self-interest.<ref>Milton Friedman</ref><ref>{{Citation | vauthors=((Watts, A.)) | title=24:43-28:00 Man in Nature | volume=The Tao of Philosophy}}</ref><ref>Joseph Campbell</ref><ref>Jordan Peterson</ref><ref>Bill Hicks</ref><ref>Bill Burr</ref> This behavior is born from mediocrity that fuels an ego-inflating/ego-protecting existential ressentiment.<ref>Friedrich Nietzsche</ref>
 ===References===