Autonomous entity: Difference between revisions

>Naps284
As requested in the "To-do list", I added a discussion about autonomous entities being real with two different hypothesis. It's difficult to give precise pros and cons because of the various philosophical questions that can arise.
>Naps284
m The debate about the existence of these entities: Just changed a word arrangement
Line 18: Line 18:
Assuming that our consciousness is formed by a complex and specific arrangement of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_network neural networks], we can say it's a consequence of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence emergent properties] of our brain. These perceived entities could be generated by unusual structural changes caused by certain substances. For example, an increase in connectivity between or inside certain areas of the brain could cause a higher likelyhood of the formation of various separated complex structures, which in some cases could be complex enough to be perceived as self-conscious or even have (or give the illusion to have) a higher intelligence than the perceiver.  
Assuming that our consciousness is formed by a complex and specific arrangement of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_network neural networks], we can say it's a consequence of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence emergent properties] of our brain. These perceived entities could be generated by unusual structural changes caused by certain substances. For example, an increase in connectivity between or inside certain areas of the brain could cause a higher likelyhood of the formation of various separated complex structures, which in some cases could be complex enough to be perceived as self-conscious or even have (or give the illusion to have) a higher intelligence than the perceiver.  


This would mean that these entities, even though most of the times perceived as separated from our Self, are complex structures emerged by changes in our neural pathways. In a certain way they would be as real as we define ourselves to be (as a "conscious" being), because both are formed by certain complex structures inside the brain. The same argument could be used in many other cases with other kinds of hallucinations and could even lead to the questioning of the definition of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality reality] itself.
This would mean that these entities, even though most of the times perceived as separated from our Self, are complex structures emerged by changes in our neural pathways. In a certain way they would be as real as we define ourselves to be (as a "conscious" being), because both our consciousness and the entities are formed by specific complex structures inside the brain. The same argument could be used in many other cases with other kinds of hallucinations and could even lead to the questioning of the definition of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality reality] itself.


Another common hypothesis is that these entities already exist inside our subconscious and/or unconscious and are perceived by the conscious part of the brain because of an abnormal change in connectivity. The presence of certain entities within the unconscious has been widely discussed even in old literature. For example some [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype Archetypes] hypothesized by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung Carl Gustav Jung] were often described as self-conscious entities.  
Another common hypothesis is that these entities already exist inside our subconscious and/or unconscious and are perceived by the conscious part of the brain because of an abnormal change in connectivity. The presence of certain entities within the unconscious has been widely discussed even in old literature. For example some [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype Archetypes] hypothesized by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung Carl Gustav Jung] were often described as self-conscious entities.