This is an unofficial archive of PsychonautWiki as of 2025-08-11T15:14:44Z. Content on this page may be outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate. Please refer to the original page for the most up-to-date information.
Talk:Alcohol: Difference between revisions
>David Hedlund The WHO's statements are more authoritative than individual opinions, precisely because they are based on a systematic evaluation of global research and expert review. |
>Graham m antithetical reasoning |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
: The inclusion of the WHO's warning in discussions of alcohol's toxicity and harm potential is justified, as it reflects the current scientific consensus and provides critical information for harm reduction. The WHO's statements are more authoritative than individual opinions, precisely because they are based on a systematic evaluation of global research and expert review. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 18:53, 11 June 2025 (UTC) | : The inclusion of the WHO's warning in discussions of alcohol's toxicity and harm potential is justified, as it reflects the current scientific consensus and provides critical information for harm reduction. The WHO's statements are more authoritative than individual opinions, precisely because they are based on a systematic evaluation of global research and expert review. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 18:53, 11 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
: I believe the reasoning for antithetical to psychonautics comes from reasoning that decreasing suggestibility is in direct opposition to an open exploration of the mind --[[User:Graham|Graham]] ([[User talk:Graham|talk]]) 21:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC) | |||