Talk:Alcohol: Difference between revisions

>Kaysee
wanted to emphasize and discuss my revision
>Graham
m antithetical reasoning
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==WHO==
[In reference to my revision, 01:29, 20 July 2024‎]
[In reference to my revision, 01:29, 20 July 2024‎]


Line 8: Line 9:


Upon reviewing that claim, '''i could not find any actual study proving the claim that infact "light or moderate" drinking is the causality for alcohol related cancers''', this is simply a corrleational claim, until a citation to a direct study can actually prove a causality here, i do not believe this section should remain.
Upon reviewing that claim, '''i could not find any actual study proving the claim that infact "light or moderate" drinking is the causality for alcohol related cancers''', this is simply a corrleational claim, until a citation to a direct study can actually prove a causality here, i do not believe this section should remain.
: The inclusion of the WHO's warning in discussions of alcohol's toxicity and harm potential is justified, as it reflects the current scientific consensus and provides critical information for harm reduction. The WHO's statements are more authoritative than individual opinions, precisely because they are based on a systematic evaluation of global research and expert review. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 18:53, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
: I believe the reasoning for antithetical to psychonautics comes from reasoning that decreasing suggestibility is in direct opposition to an open exploration of the mind --[[User:Graham|Graham]] ([[User talk:Graham|talk]]) 21:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Return to "Alcohol" page.