Sitter/participant relationship quality: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 1:

===#meta-note===

==Love==

'''Love''' is defined as the spirituality of sensation. It behooves you to regard the orgy of self-denial in ascetisicm as an equivalent impulse to the false gratification in the most extreme hedonism, enacted sadistically as a group and masochistically as an individual. <ref>Morality as Anti-Nature, Twilight of the Idols, muh boi Neitzsche</ref><ref>On Coldness and Cruelty, Deleuze</ref><ref>Alan Watts (direct-ish quote: "You ought to thank your parents for their taboo as an exercise in excitation")</ref>

<hr>

==#meta-note==

Here's some unprovable values that might be fun to expand upon or structure papers around sometime:

* Emphasize: self-mastery through strength/self-sacrifice with a heap of global interwoven mythological structures while maintaining a playful anti-institutional leaning.

Line 5:

Line 11:

Basically all my dissuades look like a Dolores Umbridge commanding everybody to empathize -> correcting them by telling them how they actually feel

Real world examples exist where people have been jailed not for saying harmful things, but for their potential to say harmful things. This is an example of a horrible sitter whom I would advise you to remove completely from your life.<ref>Christopher Hitchens, Free Speech lecture 2006</ref>

<hr />

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-===#meta-note===
+==Love==
+'''Love''' is defined as the spirituality of sensation. It behooves you to regard the orgy of self-denial in ascetisicm as an equivalent impulse to the false gratification in the most extreme hedonism, enacted sadistically as a group and masochistically as an individual. <ref>Morality as Anti-Nature, Twilight of the Idols, muh boi Neitzsche</ref><ref>On Coldness and Cruelty, Deleuze</ref><ref>Alan Watts (direct-ish quote: "You ought to thank your parents for their taboo as an exercise in excitation")</ref>
+<hr>
+<hr>
+<hr>
+==#meta-note==
 Here's some unprovable values that might be fun to expand upon or structure papers around sometime:
 * Emphasize: self-mastery through strength/self-sacrifice with a heap of global interwoven mythological structures while maintaining a playful anti-institutional leaning.
@@ Line 5: / Line 11: @@
 Basically all my dissuades look like a Dolores Umbridge commanding everybody to empathize -> correcting them by telling them how they actually feel
+Real world examples exist where people have been jailed not for saying harmful things, but for their potential to say harmful things. This is an example of a horrible sitter whom I would advise you to remove completely from your life.<ref>Christopher Hitchens, Free Speech lecture 2006</ref>
 <hr />