Talk:Hallucinatory states: Difference between revisions

Line 31:

:"While A Dictionary of Hallucinations is recommended for large academic libraries, especially those with a medical history collection, it is problematic for clinical or research-oriented organizations. Much of the book's fascinating elements serve to make it cumbersome for the practitioner... Additionally, each of the many entries describing a psychoactive substance ends with the statement, “A person intentionally employing [substance] for the purpose of exploring the psyche may be called a psychonaut.” While this may be a fact, it is a fact inessential to the definition, and the decision to include it so often hints at an unrevealed authorial agenda." (source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133898/) --[[User:Clarity|Clarity]] ([[User talk:Clarity|talk]]) 07:16, 19 December 2017 (CET)

::{{ping|Clarity}} Thank you. --[[User:David Hedlund|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund|talk]]) 07:24, 19 December 2017 (CET)

Revision as of 06:16, 19 December 2017 view source >Unity Include signature ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:25, 19 December 2017 view source >David Hedlund Thank you Clarity Newer edit →
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:"While A Dictionary of Hallucinations is recommended for large academic libraries, especially those with a medical history collection, it is problematic for clinical or research-oriented organizations. Much of the book's fascinating elements serve to make it cumbersome for the practitioner... Additionally, each of the many entries describing a psychoactive substance ends with the statement, “A person intentionally employing [substance] for the purpose of exploring the psyche may be called a psychonaut.” While this may be a fact, it is a fact inessential to the definition, and the decision to include it so often hints at an unrevealed authorial agenda." (source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133898/) --[[User:Clarity\|Clarity]] ([[User talk:Clarity\|talk]]) 07:16, 19 December 2017 (CET)		:"While A Dictionary of Hallucinations is recommended for large academic libraries, especially those with a medical history collection, it is problematic for clinical or research-oriented organizations. Much of the book's fascinating elements serve to make it cumbersome for the practitioner... Additionally, each of the many entries describing a psychoactive substance ends with the statement, “A person intentionally employing [substance] for the purpose of exploring the psyche may be called a psychonaut.” While this may be a fact, it is a fact inessential to the definition, and the decision to include it so often hints at an unrevealed authorial agenda." (source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133898/) --[[User:Clarity\|Clarity]] ([[User talk:Clarity\|talk]]) 07:16, 19 December 2017 (CET)

			::{{ping\|Clarity}} Thank you. --[[User:David Hedlund\|David Hedlund]] ([[User talk:David Hedlund\|talk]]) 07:24, 19 December 2017 (CET)